User Tools

Site Tools


laws:sgcp

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
laws:sgcp [2019/04/04 11:10]
sibo [List of state variables]
laws:sgcp [2021/06/30 11:03] (current)
sibo [Description]
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== SGCP ====== ====== SGCP ======
 ===== Description ===== ===== Description =====
-STRAIN GRADIENT CRYSTAL PLASTICITY CONSTITUTIVE \\+STRAIN GRADIENT CRYSTAL PLASTICITY CONSTITUTIVE ​LAW \\
  
-Implemented by S. Yuan 2017+Implemented by S. Yuan, L. Duchêne, ​2017
  
 ==== The model ==== ==== The model ====
 Mechanical analysis of strain gradient crystal plasticity problem \\ Mechanical analysis of strain gradient crystal plasticity problem \\
-KellerC., Habraken, A.M., DucheneL., 2012aFinite element investigation of size effects on the mechanical behavior of nickel single crystalsMaterSciEngA 550342–349https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.085 \\ +EversL.P., BrekelmansW.A.M., GeersM.G.D., 2004, JMechPhysSolids. 522379-2401doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.007 \\ 
-KellerC., Hug, E., Habraken, A.M., DucheneL., 2012bFinite element analysis of the free surface effects on the mechanical behavior of thin nickel polycrystals. Int. J. Plast29155–172https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.08.007 \\ +EversL.P., BrekelmansW.A.M., GeersM.G.D., 2004, Int. J. Solids Struct415209-5230. doi10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.04.021 \\ 
-Bayley, C.J., Brekelmans, W.A.M., Geers, M.G.D., 2006. A comparison of dislocation induced back stress formulations in strain gradient crystal plasticity. ​Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 7268–7286. ​https://doi.org/10.1016/​j.ijsolstr.2006.05.011+Bayley, C.J., Brekelmans, W.A.M., Geers, M.G.D., 2006Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 7268–7286. doi10.1016/​j.ijsolstr.2006.05.011 ​\\
 ==== Files ==== ==== Files ====
 Prepro: T151_V3.F \\ Prepro: T151_V3.F \\
Line 25: Line 25:
 |ITYPE| 973| |ITYPE| 973|
 |COMMENT| Any comment (up to 60 characters) | |COMMENT| Any comment (up to 60 characters) |
 +^ Line 2 (2I5, 8G10.0)^^
 +|INRM|iterative method (0, 1, 2)|
 +|MAXIT| ​  |
 +|PREC| ​  |
 +|damp1| ​  |
 +|damp2| ​  |
 +if (INRM .eq. 0) AMOR=damp1=1;​
 +if (INRM .eq. 1) $h_k$=damp1 & $\nu(NS)$=damp2;​
 +if (INRM .eq. 2) damping is computed automatically
 +
 ==== Real parameters ==== ==== Real parameters ====
 ^ Line 1 (3G10.0) ^^ ^ Line 1 (3G10.0) ^^
Line 90: Line 100:
 ===== State variables ===== ===== State variables =====
 ==== Number of state variables ==== ==== Number of state variables ====
-1813+1839 × 8 (integration points)
 ==== List of state variables ==== ==== List of state variables ====
 |Q(1:​9)|${(F^{B}_{P})}^{-1}$| |Q(1:​9)|${(F^{B}_{P})}^{-1}$|
Line 103: Line 113:
 |Q(298:​783)|$(\frac{d\sigma_{ij}}{dr^{\xi}_{k}})_{ijk\xi}$| |Q(298:​783)|$(\frac{d\sigma_{ij}}{dr^{\xi}_{k}})_{ijk\xi}$|
 |Q(784:​981)|$(\frac{d\gamma^{\alpha}}{dF_{kl}})_{\alpha kl}$| |Q(784:​981)|$(\frac{d\gamma^{\alpha}}{dF_{kl}})_{\alpha kl}$|
 +|Q(982:​1107)|$(\frac{d\gamma^{\alpha}}{d\rho_{GND}^{\xi}})_{\alpha \xi}$|
 +|Q(1108:​1755)|$(\frac{d\gamma^{\alpha}}{dr_{k}^{\xi}})_{\alpha k \xi}$|
 +|Q(1756:​1764)|$2^{nd}$ Piola-Kirchhoff stress $S_{11} S_{22} S_{33} S_{12} S_{13} S_{23} S_{21} S_{31} S_{32}$|
 +|Q(1765:​1770)|$\epsilon^{u}$ nature strain $e_{11} e_{12} e_{13} e_{22} e_{23} e_{33} $|
 +|Q(1771:​1773)|$\gamma^{norm} \rho_{SSD}^{norm} \rho_{GND}^{norm}$|
 +|Q(1774:​1776)|Blank|
 +|Q(1777)|Blank but resreved for $\epsilon_{eq}^{p}$|
 +|Q(1778:​1813)|reserved for ${(F^{B}_{e})}$ ${(F^{B}_{e})}^{-1}$ ${(F^{B})}^{-1}$ ${(F^{B}_{P})}$|
 +|Q(1814:​1825)|Schmid stress ($\alpha=1..12$)|
 +|Q(1826)|Schmid stress (square root norm)|
 +|Q(1827:​1838)|back-stress ($\alpha=1..12$)|
 +|Q(1839)|back-stress (square root norm)|
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
laws/sgcp.1554369047.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/08/25 15:35 (external edit)